Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Which Behaviour Change Techniques Are Most Effective at Increasing Older Adults’ Self-Efficacy and Physical Activity Behaviour? A Systematic Review

  • University of Manchester
  • City University London

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

408 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Increasing self-efficacy is an effective mechanism for increasing physical activity, especially for older people.

Methods: A systematic search identified 24 eligible studies reporting change in self-efficacy for physical activity following an intervention. Moderator analyses examined whether the inclusion of specific BCTs (as defined by CALO-RE taxonomy) was associated with changes in self-efficacy and physical activity behaviour.

Results: Overall, interventions increased self-efficacy (d = 0.37) and physical activity (d = 0.14). Self-regulatory techniques such as setting behavioural goals, prompting self-monitoring of behaviour, planning for relapses, providing normative information and providing feedback on performance were associated with lower levels of both self-efficacy and physical activity.

Conclusions: Many commonly used self-regulation intervention techniques that are effective for younger adults may not be effective for older adults.

Purpose: The aim of this review was to identify behaviour change techniques (BCTs) that increase self-efficacy and physical activity behaviour in non-clinical community-dwelling adults 60 years or over.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)225-234
Number of pages10
JournalAnnals of Behavioral Medicine
Volume48
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2014

Keywords

  • Behaviour change techniques
  • Meta-analysis
  • Older adults
  • Physical activity
  • Self-efficacy
  • Systematic review

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Which Behaviour Change Techniques Are Most Effective at Increasing Older Adults’ Self-Efficacy and Physical Activity Behaviour? A Systematic Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this