Abstract
What do the victims of tyranny owe each other? In this paper, I examine whether they can be condemned for betraying their friends, and I do so through a novel interpretation of Judith Shklar’s political thought. Shklar is a widely acknowledged and significant influence on non-ideal theory and political realism. However, there is also a previously unnoticed transformation between her early and mature work, for although she remains a sceptic her approach to moral conflict changes from value pluralism to value monism. In addition, it is only in her mature work, as a monist, she believes tyranny cancels obligations of justice. I argue here that Shklar’s monism fails, and this in turn has important implications for political realism and non-ideal theory. While attention has been focused on developing a sceptical critique of ideal theory, this interpretation of Shklar’s work illustrates that greater awareness is needed of the pitfalls of monist strands of scepticism.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 505-521 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Res Publica |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Nov 2020 |
Keywords
- Betrayal
- Judith Shklar
- Scepticism
- Tyranny
- Value monism
- Value pluralism
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'What the Victims of Tyranny Owe Each Other: On Judith Shklar’s Value Monism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver