Abstract
The mathematization of economics is almost exclusively in terms of the mathematics of real analysis which, in turn, is founded on set theory (and the axiom of choice) and orthodox mathematical logic. In this paper I try to point out that this kind of mathematization is replete with economic infelicities. The attempt to extract these infelicities is in terms of three main examples and one general discussion: dynamics, policy and rational expectations and learning are the examples; a game theory without 'subjectivism', based on the axiom of determinateness, is discussed in general terms. The focus is on the role and reliance of standard fixed-point theorems in orthodox mathematical economics.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 466-505 |
| Number of pages | 40 |
| Journal | Journal of Economic Surveys |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2007 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- General equilibrium theory
- Mathematical economics
- Rational expectations equilibrium
- Theory of policy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Variations on the theme of Conning in mathematical economics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver