Validity of self-reports in dementia research: The Geriatric Depression Scale

Michel Bédard, D. William Molloy, Larry Squire, Mary Beth Minthorn-Biggs, Sacha Dubois, Judith A. Lever, Martin O'Donnell

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Many clinicians and researchers use self-reports from patients. However, these self-reports may not be valid if patients are seriously cognitively impaired. We conducted the following study to determine the mental status level where self-reported data from the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) become invalid. Methods: This study was based on data from 1,465 individuals referred to a memory clinic for memory and/or behavior problems. We examined administration and psychometric properties of the GDS in a cross-sectional and longitudinal fashion. We used the standardized version of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) as a marker for cognitive impairment. Results: Compared to participants with an MMSE score of 29-30, those with scores of 18 or less answered fewer GDS questions (p < .01), and displayed more positive response set bias (p < .01). Comparisons of correlation patterns between GDS scores at time one and at time two for the same respondents indicated that responses of participants with lower MMSE scores could be invalid (p < .01). Discussion: Cognitive impairment may render self-reports invalid once MMSE scores decline below 20. Clinicians and researchers should be aware of this potential pitfall in using and interpreting self-reports.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)155-163
Number of pages9
JournalClinical Gerontologist
Volume26
Issue number3-4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2003
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Alzheimer's
  • Dementia
  • Geriatric Depression Scale
  • Self-reports

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Validity of self-reports in dementia research: The Geriatric Depression Scale'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this