TY - JOUR
T1 - Turbulence Scaling Comparisons in the Ocean Surface Boundary Layer
AU - Esters, L.
AU - Breivik,
AU - Landwehr, S.
AU - ten Doeschate, A.
AU - Sutherland, G.
AU - Christensen, K. H.
AU - Bidlot, J. R.
AU - Ward, B.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2018/3
Y1 - 2018/3
N2 - Direct observations of the dissipation rate of turbulent kinetic energy, ϵ, under open ocean conditions are limited. Consequently, our understanding of what chiefly controls dissipation in the open ocean, and its functional form with depth, is poorly constrained. In this study, we report direct open ocean measurements of ϵ from the Air-Sea Interaction Profiler (ASIP) collected during five different cruises in the Atlantic Ocean. We then combine these data with ocean-atmosphere flux measurements and wave information in order to evaluate existing turbulence scaling theories under a diverse set of open ocean conditions. Our results do not support the presence of a “breaking” or a “transition layer,” which has been previously suggested. Instead, ϵ decays as |z|-1.29 over the depth interval, which was previously defined as “transition layer,” and as |z|-1.15 over the mixing layer. This depth dependency does not significantly vary between nonbreaking or breaking wave conditions. A scaling relationship based on the friction velocity, the wave age, and the significant wave height describes the observations best for daytime conditions. For conditions during which convection is important, it is necessary to take buoyancy forcing into account.
AB - Direct observations of the dissipation rate of turbulent kinetic energy, ϵ, under open ocean conditions are limited. Consequently, our understanding of what chiefly controls dissipation in the open ocean, and its functional form with depth, is poorly constrained. In this study, we report direct open ocean measurements of ϵ from the Air-Sea Interaction Profiler (ASIP) collected during five different cruises in the Atlantic Ocean. We then combine these data with ocean-atmosphere flux measurements and wave information in order to evaluate existing turbulence scaling theories under a diverse set of open ocean conditions. Our results do not support the presence of a “breaking” or a “transition layer,” which has been previously suggested. Instead, ϵ decays as |z|-1.29 over the depth interval, which was previously defined as “transition layer,” and as |z|-1.15 over the mixing layer. This depth dependency does not significantly vary between nonbreaking or breaking wave conditions. A scaling relationship based on the friction velocity, the wave age, and the significant wave height describes the observations best for daytime conditions. For conditions during which convection is important, it is necessary to take buoyancy forcing into account.
KW - scaling
KW - turbulence
KW - upper ocean
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85045916529
U2 - 10.1002/2017JC013525
DO - 10.1002/2017JC013525
M3 - Article
SN - 2169-9275
VL - 123
SP - 2172
EP - 2191
JO - Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
JF - Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
IS - 3
ER -