Abstract
Patients with CKD and CAD have traditionally been a difficult population to diagnose and treat in the setting of ACS. In addition to having poorer outcomes post-ACS, data are lacking regarding best treatments available. Aggressive interventional and medical treatments in this group with already poor outcomes are not necessarily contraindicated and should always be considered. The appalling outcome for CKD patients post-ACS is improved by many therapies shown to benefit in the non-CKD patients. Data suggest that troponins are useful markers in CKD patients, that major bleeding is not increased with the use of GP IIb-IIIa antagonists, that thrombolytics have been used successfully in CKD patients, and that PCI electively and as a primary treatment for ACS is successful and probably more beneficial than no treatment.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 563-585 |
Number of pages | 23 |
Journal | Medical Clinics of North America |
Volume | 89 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - May 2005 |
Externally published | Yes |