Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Transition phenomena for the attractor of an iterated function system* * This work was partially supported by a grant from the Simons Foundation (322515 to Andrew Vince).

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Iterated function systems (IFSs) and their attractors have been central in fractal geometry. If the functions in the IFS are contractions, then the IFS is guaranteed to have a unique attractor. Two natural questions concerning contractivity arise. First, whether an IFS needs to be contractive to admit an attractor? Second, what occurs to the attractor at the boundary between contractivity and expansion of an IFS? The first question is addressed in the paper by providing examples of highly noncontractive IFSs with attractors. The second question leads to the study of two types of transition phenomena associated with an IFS family that depend on a real parameter. These are called lower and upper transition attractors. Their existence and properties are the main topic of this paper. Lower transition attractors are related to the semiattractors, introduced by Lasota and Myjak in 1990s. Upper transition attractors are related to the problem of continuous dependence of an attractor upon the IFS. A main result states that, for a wide class of IFS families, there is a threshold such that the IFSs in the one-parameter family have an attractor for parameters below the threshold and they have no attractor for parameters above the threshold. At the threshold there exists a unique upper transition attractor.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5396-5426
Number of pages31
JournalNonlinearity
Volume35
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Oct 2022
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • 28A80
  • attractor
  • iterated function system
  • threshold

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Transition phenomena for the attractor of an iterated function system* * This work was partially supported by a grant from the Simons Foundation (322515 to Andrew Vince).'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this