Abstract
In recent years, the historiography of World War I has undergone a very significant transformation in terms of its geographical scope and thematic reach. While most studies of World War I up to the 1990s focused on national experiences, a generation of new scholars subsequently began analyzing the War in comparative perspective across Europe and the world.1 The following decade saw the emergence of a global approach to First World War studies, pioneered by Hew Strachan and Michael Neiberg and developed in a range of recent reference works.2 Jay Winter has identified a significant increase in studies of the War as a transnational phenomenon, defined by Ian Tyrell as an emphasis on “the movement of peoples, ideas, technologies, and institutions across the border.”3 Due to both the transnational training of World War I historians and the collapse of political and ideological dichotomies with the end of the Cold War, a transnational view has emerged in opposition to an international approach which privileges the diplomatic history of the War.4
| Original language | English (Ireland) |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Small Nations and Colonial Peripheries in World War I |
| Publisher | Brill |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9.789E+12 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9.789E+12 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Feb 2016 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Towards an Interconnected History of World War I: Europe and Beyond'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver