To Irritate or to Rescind: Two Paths For The Landlord?

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

Abstract

This article considers the two routes open to a landlord faced with a material breach of lease by the tenant, rescission for material breach or irritancy of the lease. (The discussion in the article was referred to approvingly in the judgment of Lord Pentland in Crieff Highland Gathering Ltd v. Perth and Kinross Council [2011] CSOH 78.)This article considers the two routes open to a landlord faced with a material breach of lease by the tenant, rescission for material breach or irritancy of the lease. (The discussion in the article was referred to approvingly in the judgment of Lord Pentland in Crieff Highland Gathering Ltd v. Perth and Kinross Council [2011] CSOH 78.)
Original languageEnglish (Ireland)
JournalScots Law Times
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 1999

Authors (Note for portal: view the doc link for the full list of authors)

  • Authors
  • Hogg, Martin

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'To Irritate or to Rescind: Two Paths For The Landlord?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this