TY - JOUR
T1 - Ticagrelor Monotherapy or Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation
T2 - Per-Protocol Analysis of the GLOBAL LEADERS Trial
AU - on behalf of the GLOBAL LEADERS Investigators
AU - Gragnano, Felice
AU - Zwahlen, Marcel
AU - Vranckx, Pascal
AU - Heg, Dik
AU - Schmidlin, Kurt
AU - Hamm, Christian
AU - Steg, Philippe Gabriel
AU - Gargiulo, Giuseppe
AU - McFadden, Eugene P.
AU - Onuma, Yoshinobu
AU - Chichareon, Ply
AU - Benit, Edouard
AU - Möllmann, Helge
AU - Janssens, Luc
AU - Leonardi, Sergio
AU - Zurakowski, Aleksander
AU - Arrivi, Alessio
AU - Van Geuns, Robert Jan
AU - Huber, Kurt
AU - Slagboom, Ton
AU - Calabrò, Paolo
AU - Serruys, Patrick W.
AU - Jüni, Peter
AU - Valgimigli, Marco
AU - Windecker, Stephan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley.
PY - 2022/5/17
Y1 - 2022/5/17
N2 - BACKGROUND: In the GLOBAL LEADERS trial, ticagrelor monotherapy beyond 1 month compared with standard antiplatelet regimens after coronary stent implantation did not improve outcomes at intention-to-treat analysis. Considerable differences in treatment adherence between the experimental and control groups may have affected the intention-to-treat results. In this reanalysis of the GLOBAL LEADERS trial, we compared the experimental and control treatment strategies in a per-protocol analysis of patients who did not deviate from the study protocol. METHODS AND RESULTS: Baseline and postrandomization information were used to classify whether and when patients were deviating from the study protocol. With logistic regressions, we derived time-varying inverse probabilities of nondeviation from protocol to reconstruct the trial population without protocol deviation. The primary end point was a composite of all-cause mortality or nonfatal Q-wave myocardial infarction at 2 years. At 2-year follow-up, 1103 (13.8%) of 7980 patients in the experimental group and 785 (9.8%) of 7988 patients in the control group qualified as protocol deviators. At per-protocol analysis, the rate ratio for the primary end point was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.75–1.03; P=0.10) on the basis of 274 versus 325 events in the experimental versus control group. The rate ratio for the key safety end point of major bleeding was 1.00 (95% CI, 0.79–1.26; P=0.99). The per-protocol and intention-to-treat effect estimates were overall consistent. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients who complied with the study protocol in the GLOBAL LEADERS trial, ticagrelor plus aspirin for 1 month followed by ticagrelor monotherapy was not superior to 1-year standard dual antiplatelet therapy followed by aspirin alone at 2 years after coronary stenting. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01813435.
AB - BACKGROUND: In the GLOBAL LEADERS trial, ticagrelor monotherapy beyond 1 month compared with standard antiplatelet regimens after coronary stent implantation did not improve outcomes at intention-to-treat analysis. Considerable differences in treatment adherence between the experimental and control groups may have affected the intention-to-treat results. In this reanalysis of the GLOBAL LEADERS trial, we compared the experimental and control treatment strategies in a per-protocol analysis of patients who did not deviate from the study protocol. METHODS AND RESULTS: Baseline and postrandomization information were used to classify whether and when patients were deviating from the study protocol. With logistic regressions, we derived time-varying inverse probabilities of nondeviation from protocol to reconstruct the trial population without protocol deviation. The primary end point was a composite of all-cause mortality or nonfatal Q-wave myocardial infarction at 2 years. At 2-year follow-up, 1103 (13.8%) of 7980 patients in the experimental group and 785 (9.8%) of 7988 patients in the control group qualified as protocol deviators. At per-protocol analysis, the rate ratio for the primary end point was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.75–1.03; P=0.10) on the basis of 274 versus 325 events in the experimental versus control group. The rate ratio for the key safety end point of major bleeding was 1.00 (95% CI, 0.79–1.26; P=0.99). The per-protocol and intention-to-treat effect estimates were overall consistent. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients who complied with the study protocol in the GLOBAL LEADERS trial, ticagrelor plus aspirin for 1 month followed by ticagrelor monotherapy was not superior to 1-year standard dual antiplatelet therapy followed by aspirin alone at 2 years after coronary stenting. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01813435.
KW - DAPT
KW - intention-to-treat
KW - P2Y inhibitor monotherapy
KW - per-protocol
KW - ticagrelor
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85130643091
U2 - 10.1161/JAHA.121.024291
DO - 10.1161/JAHA.121.024291
M3 - Article
C2 - 35229616
AN - SCOPUS:85130643091
SN - 2047-9980
VL - 11
JO - Journal of the American Heart Association
JF - Journal of the American Heart Association
IS - 10
M1 - e024291
ER -