The utility of a genetic kidney disease clinic employing a broad range of genomic testing platforms: experience of the Irish Kidney Gene Project

  • Elhussein A.E. Elhassan
  • , Susan L. Murray
  • , Dervla M. Connaughton
  • , Claire Kennedy
  • , Sarah Cormican
  • , Cliona Cowhig
  • , Caragh Stapleton
  • , Mark A. Little
  • , Kendrah Kidd
  • , Anthony J. Bleyer
  • , Martina Živná
  • , Stanislav Kmoch
  • , Neil K. Fennelly
  • , Brendan Doyle
  • , Anthony Dorman
  • , Matthew D. Griffin
  • , Liam Casserly
  • , Peter C. Harris
  • , Friedhelm Hildebrandt
  • , Gianpiero L. Cavalleri
  • Katherine A. Benson, Peter J. Conlon

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and aims: Genetic testing presents a unique opportunity for diagnosis and management of genetic kidney diseases (GKD). Here, we describe the clinical utility and valuable impact of a specialized GKD clinic, which uses a variety of genomic sequencing strategies. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, we undertook genetic testing in adults with suspected GKD according to prespecified criteria. Over 7 years, patients were referred from tertiary centres across Ireland to an academic medical centre as part of the Irish Kidney Gene Project. Results: Among 677 patients, the mean age was of 37.2 ± 13 years, and 73.9% of the patients had family history of chronic kidney disease (CKD). We achieved a molecular diagnostic rate of 50.9%. Four genes accounted for more than 70% of identified pathogenic variants: PKD1 and PKD2 (n = 186, 53.4%), MUC1 (8.9%), and COL4A5 (8.3%). In 162 patients with a genetic diagnosis, excluding PKD1/PKD2, the a priori diagnosis was confirmed in 58% and in 13% the diagnosis was reclassified. A genetic diagnosis was established in 22 (29.7%) patients with CKD of uncertain aetiology. Based on genetic testing, a diagnostic kidney biopsy was unnecessary in 13 (8%) patients. Presence of family history of CKD and the underlying a priori diagnosis were independent predictors (P < 0.001) of a positive genetic diagnosis. Conclusions: A dedicated GKD clinic is a valuable resource, and its implementation of various genomic strategies has resulted in a direct, demonstrable clinical and therapeutic benefits to affected patients. Graphical abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.]

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1655-1665
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Nephrology
Volume35
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2022

Keywords

  • Chronic kidney disease
  • Genetic kidney disease
  • Inherited kidney diseases
  • Next-generation sequencing
  • Polycystic kidney genetics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The utility of a genetic kidney disease clinic employing a broad range of genomic testing platforms: experience of the Irish Kidney Gene Project'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this