The sensitivity of set-up/set-down and wave-driven currents to different breaking models

  • Carl Newell
  • , Thomas Mullarkey

Research output: Chapter in Book or Conference Publication/ProceedingConference Publicationpeer-review

Abstract

The authors have developed a wave-current interaction model. It includes a wave sub-model based on the elliptic form of the mild slope wave equation with a parabolic mild slope wave equation as a boundary condition. It also includes a hydrodynamic sub-model which has been developed to examine set-up, set-down and currents in the coastal zone. The wave breaking model used in the wave sub-model affects the results of set-up, set-down and current obtained using the hydrodynamic sub-model. This paper examines a number of different breaking models and compares the set-up, set-down and currents obtained using radiation stress values which are calculated from derivatives of velocity potential. The velocity potential is obtained in the wave sub-model using the various breaking models being examined. The results show a number of possible breaking models for set-up and set-down calculation and also shows shortcomings in various breaking models when it comes to calculation of longshore currents.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 26th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering 2007, OMAE2007
Pages283-290
Number of pages8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007
Event26th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering 2007, OMAE2007 - San Diego, CA, United States
Duration: 10 Jun 200715 Jun 2007

Publication series

NameProceedings of the International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering - OMAE
Volume5

Conference

Conference26th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering 2007, OMAE2007
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CitySan Diego, CA
Period10/06/0715/06/07

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The sensitivity of set-up/set-down and wave-driven currents to different breaking models'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this