The paradox of "Structured" methods for software requirements management: A case study of an e-government development project

Research output: Chapter in Book or Conference Publication/ProceedingConference Publicationpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This chapter outlines the alternative perspectives of " rationalism" and "improvisation" within information systems development and describes the major shortcomings of each. It then discusses how these shortcomings manifested themselves within an e-government case study where a "structured" requirements management method was employed. Although this method was very prescriptive and firmly rooted in the "rational" paradigm, it was observed that users often resorted to improvised behaviour, such as privately making decisions on how certain aspects of the method should or should not be implemented.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationInformation Systems Development
Subtitle of host publicationAsian Experiences
Pages223-232
Number of pages10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011
Event18th International Conference on Information Systems Development, ISD 2009 - Nanchang, China
Duration: 16 Sep 200919 Sep 2009

Publication series

NameInformation Systems Development: Asian Experiences

Conference

Conference18th International Conference on Information Systems Development, ISD 2009
Country/TerritoryChina
CityNanchang
Period16/09/0919/09/09

Keywords

  • E-government systems development
  • Method enactment
  • Requirements management
  • Requirements prioritisation
  • Situated action

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The paradox of "Structured" methods for software requirements management: A case study of an e-government development project'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this