Abstract
The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, as interpreted by the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child, contains many rights that are relevant to child migrants. The European Convention on Human Rights, by contrast, contains no child-specific rights. Nevertheless the European Court of Human Rights has developed a sophisticated jurisprudence related to child migrants. This chapter explores that jurisprudence from a child-rights perspective. In doing so, a number of questions are asked: What difference does it make to be a child, as opposed to an adult migrant? To what extent is the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights consistent with the lex specialis of the Convention on the Rights of the Child? How does the widely-recognised international principle of the best interests of the child feature in the Courts analysis and to what effect? These questions are explored with reference to such topical issues as the immigration detention of children, the living conditions of asylum-seeking children and the deportation of immigrant parents. It is established that the Court is alive and responsive to the particular impact that immigration decisions have on children and on their rights, although not evenly so.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Research Handbook on Child Migration |
| Publisher | Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. |
| Pages | 140-156 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781786433701 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781786433695 |
| Publication status | Published - 31 Aug 2018 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights relevant to child migrants'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver