Abstract
Wound measurement provides baseline information while continuous measurement helps to predict healing and aids monitoring of treatment efficacy and evaluation. It is also objective and can be useful in cost-benefit analysis. Methods such as the ruler technique are inaccurate and do not account for changes in wound shape and such practice should be discouraged. Acetate and planimetry are widely available, easy to use and have a good inter-rater agreement as demonstrated by many studies. The result of most methods of wound measuring depends on the accuracy of the original tracing. Methods, however, are not interchangeable.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 60-68 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Wounds UK |
| Volume | 2 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2006 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Area measurement
- Methods
- Prediction of time to healing
- Wound measuring
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The importance of continuous wound measuring'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver