The great iFR vs. FFR debate: Why sometimes "the wait and see approach" is the best tactic as the best pragmatic solution will always emerge and become established

Patrick W. Serruys

doi:10.4244/EIJV9I1A1

The great iFR vs. FFR debate: Why sometimes "the wait and see approach" is the best tactic as the best pragmatic solution will always emerge and become established

Patrick W. Serruys

Medicine

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer) › Editorial

4 Citations (Scopus)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	11-12
Number of pages	2
Journal	EuroIntervention
Volume	9
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJV9I1A1
Publication status	Published - 2013

Access to Document

10.4244/EIJV9I1A1

Cite this

@article{1c20a0ec098d4f31aeb99ec15a3980b3,

title = "The great iFR vs. FFR debate: Why sometimes {"}the wait and see approach{"} is the best tactic as the best pragmatic solution will always emerge and become established",

author = "Serruys, \{Patrick W.\}",

year = "2013",

doi = "10.4244/EIJV9I1A1",

language = "English",

volume = "9",

pages = "11--12",

journal = "EuroIntervention",

issn = "1774-024X",

publisher = "Europa Group",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The great iFR vs. FFR debate

T2 - Why sometimes "the wait and see approach" is the best tactic as the best pragmatic solution will always emerge and become established

AU - Serruys, Patrick W.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84880034631

U2 - 10.4244/EIJV9I1A1

DO - 10.4244/EIJV9I1A1

M3 - Editorial

C2 - 23685289

AN - SCOPUS:84880034631

SN - 1774-024X

VL - 9

SP - 11

EP - 12

JO - EuroIntervention

JF - EuroIntervention

IS - 1

ER -

The great iFR vs. FFR debate: Why sometimes "the wait and see approach" is the best tactic as the best pragmatic solution will always emerge and become established

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this