Abstract
Objective: To examine the effect of the fourteen-day rule on the colorectal service of a district general hospital. Methods: Prospective audit of all patients by general practitioners to the colorectal service of a district general hospital serving a population of approximately 300,000 people. The main outcome measures were: (i) mean interval in days from referral to first clinic appointment; (ii) first clinic appointment to diagnosis; and (iii) overall interval from referral to diagnosis. Results: There was a change in the referral pattern with greater numbers of 'fourteen-day rule' and urgent referrals than expected (P < 0.001). The mean time interval from referral to diagnosis was reduced (P < 0.01). This was due to a reduction in the wait for a first clinic appointment (P < 0.01). The wait between first appointment and diagnosis was unchanged (P < 0.05). Waiting times for patients referred as 'routine' or whose GPs did not specify a priority also improved. Conclusions: The fourteen-day rule' with respect to colorectal cancer has reduced waiting times for a first appointment to see a specialist. Further improvements will require additional resources to reduce the delay for investigations. The effect on long-term survival remains to be seen.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 386-388 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England |
| Volume | 84 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2002 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Colorectal cancer
- Diagnosis
- Waiting times
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The fourteen-day rule and colorectal cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver