The European Collective Redress Debate after the European Commission's Recommendation: One Step Forward, Two Steps Back?

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The paper examines, through the prism of the European Commission's Recommendation, the European approach on collective redress. First, it demonstrates that the introduction of collective redress in respect of small claims is necessary and the opt-out scheme is preferable. Second, it refutes the major arguments and fears against the opt-out system. Third, it demonstrates that the pivotal question of collective redress is financing and the law should provide a risk premium to the group representative.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)530-552
Number of pages23
JournalMaastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law
Volume22
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2015
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • class action
  • collective redress
  • comparative law
  • EU law
  • legal transplants

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The European Collective Redress Debate after the European Commission's Recommendation: One Step Forward, Two Steps Back?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this