TY - JOUR
T1 - The effects of national cultures on two technologically advanced countries
T2 - The case of e-leadership in South Korea and the United States
AU - Liu, Cheol
AU - Van Wart, Montgomery
AU - Kim, Soonhee
AU - Wang, Xiaohu
AU - McCarthy, Alma
AU - Ready, David
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Institute of Public Administration Australia
PY - 2020/9/1
Y1 - 2020/9/1
N2 - The increased use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) has triggered enormous innovation in the public sector and created positive public value at the managerial, delivery of services, and policy levels. However, these positive outcomes do not automatically accrue simply by adoption of ICTs as public leaders can fail to adopt relevant new ICTs, use them poorly, or use them in ways that actually diminish public value, which raises the question of the importance of e-leadership. This article examines e-leadership and innovation capacity at the individual public manager level and fills in some gaps about the practice and implementation of ICTs in the public sector. We explore eight research questions useful in theorizing about e-leadership, develop constructs of e-leadership, and describe the current development of e-leadership. By comparing e-leadership in two country settings (South Korea and the United States), we also overcome the limitations of the existing Western-oriented studies about innovations in the public sector. In addition to the growth of e-leadership use and requirements for a variety of competencies equivalent to, but separate from, traditional communication competences, we find that national cultures exert significant influence on the major constructs of e-leadership, which implies that an effective e-leadership strategy should consider cultural contexts seriously.
AB - The increased use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) has triggered enormous innovation in the public sector and created positive public value at the managerial, delivery of services, and policy levels. However, these positive outcomes do not automatically accrue simply by adoption of ICTs as public leaders can fail to adopt relevant new ICTs, use them poorly, or use them in ways that actually diminish public value, which raises the question of the importance of e-leadership. This article examines e-leadership and innovation capacity at the individual public manager level and fills in some gaps about the practice and implementation of ICTs in the public sector. We explore eight research questions useful in theorizing about e-leadership, develop constructs of e-leadership, and describe the current development of e-leadership. By comparing e-leadership in two country settings (South Korea and the United States), we also overcome the limitations of the existing Western-oriented studies about innovations in the public sector. In addition to the growth of e-leadership use and requirements for a variety of competencies equivalent to, but separate from, traditional communication competences, we find that national cultures exert significant influence on the major constructs of e-leadership, which implies that an effective e-leadership strategy should consider cultural contexts seriously.
KW - comparative leadership
KW - culture and technology
KW - e-leadership
KW - e-leadership in South Korea
KW - e-leadership in the United States
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85086001726
U2 - 10.1111/1467-8500.12433
DO - 10.1111/1467-8500.12433
M3 - Article
SN - 0313-6647
VL - 79
SP - 298
EP - 329
JO - Australian Journal of Public Administration
JF - Australian Journal of Public Administration
IS - 3
ER -