TY - JOUR
T1 - The effects of adding zoledronic acid to neoadjuvant chemotherapy on tumour response
T2 - Exploratory evidence for direct anti-tumour activity in breast cancer
AU - Coleman, R. E.
AU - Winter, M. C.
AU - Cameron, D.
AU - Bell, R.
AU - Dodwell, D.
AU - Keane, M. M.
AU - Gil, M.
AU - Ritchie, D.
AU - Passos-Coelho, J. L.
AU - Wheatley, D.
AU - Burkinshaw, R.
AU - Marshall, S. J.
AU - Thorpe, H.
PY - 2010/3
Y1 - 2010/3
N2 - Background:Pre-clinical studies have demonstrated synergistic anti-tumour effects of chemotherapy (CT) and zoledronic acid (ZOL). Within the AZURE trial, designed to determine whether the addition of ZOL to neoadjuvant therapy improves disease outcomes, a subgroup received neoadjuvant CT. We report a retrospective evaluation comparing pathological response in the primary tumour between treatment groups.Methods:In total, 205 patients received neoadjuvant CTZOL (CTZOL, n102; CT, n103). The primary end point was pathologically assessed residual invasive tumour size (RITS) at surgery. Secondary end points were pathological complete response (pCR) rate and axillary nodal involvement. Following review of surgical pathology reports (n195), outcome differences between groups were assessed adjusting for potential response modifiers.Results:Baseline characteristics and CT treatments were similar. In multivariate analysis, allowing for biological and clinical factors known to influence tumour response, the adjusted mean RITS in CT and CTZOL groups were 27.4 and 15.5 mm, respectively, giving a difference in means of 12 mm (95% confidence interval: 3.5-20.4 mm; P0.006). The pCR rate was 6.9% in the CT group and 11.7% in the CTZOL group (P0.146). There was no difference in axillary nodal involvement (P0.6315).Conclusion:These data suggest a possible direct anti-tumour effect of ZOL in combination with CT, warranting formal evaluation in prospective studies.
AB - Background:Pre-clinical studies have demonstrated synergistic anti-tumour effects of chemotherapy (CT) and zoledronic acid (ZOL). Within the AZURE trial, designed to determine whether the addition of ZOL to neoadjuvant therapy improves disease outcomes, a subgroup received neoadjuvant CT. We report a retrospective evaluation comparing pathological response in the primary tumour between treatment groups.Methods:In total, 205 patients received neoadjuvant CTZOL (CTZOL, n102; CT, n103). The primary end point was pathologically assessed residual invasive tumour size (RITS) at surgery. Secondary end points were pathological complete response (pCR) rate and axillary nodal involvement. Following review of surgical pathology reports (n195), outcome differences between groups were assessed adjusting for potential response modifiers.Results:Baseline characteristics and CT treatments were similar. In multivariate analysis, allowing for biological and clinical factors known to influence tumour response, the adjusted mean RITS in CT and CTZOL groups were 27.4 and 15.5 mm, respectively, giving a difference in means of 12 mm (95% confidence interval: 3.5-20.4 mm; P0.006). The pCR rate was 6.9% in the CT group and 11.7% in the CTZOL group (P0.146). There was no difference in axillary nodal involvement (P0.6315).Conclusion:These data suggest a possible direct anti-tumour effect of ZOL in combination with CT, warranting formal evaluation in prospective studies.
KW - Anti-tumour activity
KW - Breast cancer
KW - Chemotherapy
KW - Neoadjuvant
KW - Pathological response
KW - ZOL
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77950370156&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605604
DO - 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605604
M3 - Article
C2 - 20234364
AN - SCOPUS:77950370156
SN - 0007-0920
VL - 102
SP - 1099
EP - 1105
JO - British Journal of Cancer
JF - British Journal of Cancer
IS - 7
ER -