The effect of levofloxacin concentration on the development and maintenance of antibiotic-resistant clones of Escherichia coli in chemostat culture

G. T. Fleming, D. M. McCarthy, N. Colombet, J. W. Patching

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A levofloxacin-sensitive strain of Escherichia coli(broth MIC: 0.0625 mg l-1) was grown in carbon-limited chemostat culture for 316 h (D= 0.294 h-1). Hyperresistant strains isolated after 58 and 91 generations of culture retained a 16- to 47-fold increase in tolerance to levofloxacin during antibiotic-free serial batch and continuous culture (20 generations, glucose-limited, D=0.2 h-1). Isolates differed from the original strain in their maximum growth rates in the presence and absence of subinhibitory levels of levofloxacin, protein-banding profiles, and resistance to a range of antibiotics. Competition between resistant isolates and the original sensitive strain was studied in glucose-limited chemostat cultures (D= 0.2 h-1). At levofloxacin concentrations less than 0.03 mg l-1, the sensitive strain outcompeted resistant isolates and displaced them from the culture, whereas the reverse was true at higher concentrations. These results have clinical and environmental implications for those administering levofloxacin.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)155-162
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology
Volume29
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2002

Keywords

  • Chemostat
  • Competition
  • Escherichia coli
  • Levofloxacin resistance
  • Minimum selection concentration
  • Selection

Authors (Note for portal: view the doc link for the full list of authors)

  • Authors
  • Fleming, GT;McCarthy, DM;Colombet, N;Patching, JW

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The effect of levofloxacin concentration on the development and maintenance of antibiotic-resistant clones of Escherichia coli in chemostat culture'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this