Abstract
Order judgements are slower and less accurate when reversed. That is, when participants see two events in a sequence (e.g., circle …square), they are quicker to report ‘Before’ statements (e.g., “Circle before Square”) than ‘After’ statements (“Square after Circle”). The current study sought to determine whether a reversal effect will also occur when participants are instructed to produce a sequence of responses. Twenty participants were trained to criterion on simple ‘Before’ and ‘After’ instructions that specified sequences of two responses (e.g., “Circle before Square”). In a subsequent test, participants produced instructed sequences (e.g., circle … square) more quickly and more reliably when instructed to choose one stimulus before another than when they were requested to choose one stimulus after another. The implications of these findings for current theories of relational responding are considered.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 311-319 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Psychological Record |
| Volume | 64 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 30 May 2014 |
Keywords
- After
- Before
- Mutual entailment
- Relational responding
- Sequential responding
- Temporal instructions