TY - JOUR
T1 - Tensions in talent identification
T2 - a multi-stakeholder perspective
AU - McDonnell, Anthony
AU - Skuza, Agnieszka
AU - Jooss, Stefan
AU - Scullion, Hugh
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Research on how organisations identify talent in practice remains limited. Too often it appears that the most core construct–talent–is taken for granted in terms of how key stakeholders make sense of and give meaning to it in practice. This paper examines the talent definitions held by multiple organisational stakeholders and the criteria used in the practice of identification. Drawing from content analysis of over 200 interviews, our findings demonstrate substantial discrepancies between senior leaders’ and talents’ view on the meaning of talent within organisations. Moreover, there was little awareness of the identification criteria used by decision-makers that gives individuals the talent designation. Given the potential impact of this designation on employee attitudes, behaviours, and performance, the seemingly limited relationship between the meaning ascribed to talent and the identification criteria used in practice is likely to raise concerns about fairness and transparency. The findings indicate the absence of a shared and well-defined talent philosophy which we suggest is needed to guide talent management practices.
AB - Research on how organisations identify talent in practice remains limited. Too often it appears that the most core construct–talent–is taken for granted in terms of how key stakeholders make sense of and give meaning to it in practice. This paper examines the talent definitions held by multiple organisational stakeholders and the criteria used in the practice of identification. Drawing from content analysis of over 200 interviews, our findings demonstrate substantial discrepancies between senior leaders’ and talents’ view on the meaning of talent within organisations. Moreover, there was little awareness of the identification criteria used by decision-makers that gives individuals the talent designation. Given the potential impact of this designation on employee attitudes, behaviours, and performance, the seemingly limited relationship between the meaning ascribed to talent and the identification criteria used in practice is likely to raise concerns about fairness and transparency. The findings indicate the absence of a shared and well-defined talent philosophy which we suggest is needed to guide talent management practices.
KW - content analysis
KW - high performers
KW - high potentials
KW - internal stakeholders
KW - Talent
KW - talent identification
KW - talent management
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85114856938
U2 - 10.1080/09585192.2021.1976245
DO - 10.1080/09585192.2021.1976245
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85114856938
SN - 0958-5192
VL - 34
SP - 1132
EP - 1156
JO - International Journal of Human Resource Management
JF - International Journal of Human Resource Management
IS - 6
ER -