Ten-year prognostic impact of target versus non-target vessel failure after STEMI. Insight from the EXAMINATION-EXTEND trial

Filippo Maria Verardi, Kamil Bujak, Paolo Tolomeo, Josep Gómez-Lara, Víctor Jiménez-Díaz, Marcelo Jiménez, Pilar Jiménez-Quevedo, Roberto Diletti, Pascual Bordes, Gianluca Campo, Antonio Silvestro, Jaume Maristany, Xacobe Flores, Antonio de Miguel-Castro, Andrés Íñiguez, Alfonso Ielasi, Maurizio Tespili, Mattie Lenzen, Nieves Gonzalo, Matteo TebaldiSimone Biscaglia, Pablo Vidal-Cales, Luis Ortega-Paz, Rafael Romaguera, Joan Antoni Gómez-Hospital, Patrick W. Serruys, Manel Sabaté, Salvatore Brugaletta

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

Abstract

Introduction and objectives: After ST-segment myocardial infarction (STEMI), the impact of different adverse events on prognosis remains unknown. We aimed to assess very long-term predictors of patient-oriented composite endpoints (POCE) and investigate whether the occurrence of target vessel failure (TVF) vs a non-TVF event as the first event could potentially influence subsequent outcomes. Methods: The EXAMINATION.EXTEND trial randomized STEMI patients to receive either an everolimus-eluting stent or a bare-metal stent. The follow-up period was 10 years. Predictors of POCE (a composite of all-cause death, any myocardial infarction, or any revascularization) were evaluated in the overall study population. The patients were stratified based on the type of first event (TVF-first vs non–TVF-first) and were compared in terms of subsequent POCE. TVF was defined as a composite of cardiac death, TV myocardial infarction, or TV revascularization. Results: Out of the 1498 enrolled patients, 529 (35.3%) experienced a POCE during the 10-year follow-up. Independent predictors of POCE were age, diabetes mellitus, previous myocardial infarction, peripheral arterial disease, and multivessel coronary disease. The first event was a TVF in 296 patients and was a non-TVF in 233 patients. No significant differences were observed between TVF-first and non–TVF-first patients in terms of subsequent POCE (21.7% vs 39.3%, time ratio 1.79; 95%CI, 0.87-3.67; P = .12) or its individual components. Conclusions: At the 10-year follow-up, approximately one-third of STEMI patients had experienced at least 1 POCE. Independent predictors of these events were age, diabetes, and more extensive atherosclerotic disease. The occurrence of a TVF or a non-TVF as the first event did not seem to influence subsequent outcomes. Trial registration number: NCT04462315.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)215-225
Number of pages11
JournalRevista Espanola de Cardiologia
Volume77
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2024

Keywords

  • Percutaneous coronary intervention
  • ST-segment myocardial infarction
  • Target vessel failure

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ten-year prognostic impact of target versus non-target vessel failure after STEMI. Insight from the EXAMINATION-EXTEND trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this