Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Ten-year prognostic impact of target versus non-target vessel failure after STEMI. Insight from the EXAMINATION-EXTEND trial

  • Filippo Maria Verardi
  • , Kamil Bujak
  • , Paolo Tolomeo
  • , Josep Gómez-Lara
  • , Víctor Jiménez-Díaz
  • , Marcelo Jiménez
  • , Pilar Jiménez-Quevedo
  • , Roberto Diletti
  • , Pascual Bordes
  • , Gianluca Campo
  • , Antonio Silvestro
  • , Jaume Maristany
  • , Xacobe Flores
  • , Antonio de Miguel-Castro
  • , Andrés Íñiguez
  • , Alfonso Ielasi
  • , Maurizio Tespili
  • , Mattie Lenzen
  • , Nieves Gonzalo
  • , Matteo Tebaldi
  • Simone Biscaglia, Pablo Vidal-Cales, Luis Ortega-Paz, Rafael Romaguera, Joan Antoni Gómez-Hospital, Patrick W. Serruys, Manel Sabaté, Salvatore Brugaletta

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

Abstract

Introduction and objectives: After ST-segment myocardial infarction (STEMI), the impact of different adverse events on prognosis remains unknown. We aimed to assess very long-term predictors of patient-oriented composite endpoints (POCE) and investigate whether the occurrence of target vessel failure (TVF) vs a non-TVF event as the first event could potentially influence subsequent outcomes. Methods: The EXAMINATION.EXTEND trial randomized STEMI patients to receive either an everolimus-eluting stent or a bare-metal stent. The follow-up period was 10 years. Predictors of POCE (a composite of all-cause death, any myocardial infarction, or any revascularization) were evaluated in the overall study population. The patients were stratified based on the type of first event (TVF-first vs non–TVF-first) and were compared in terms of subsequent POCE. TVF was defined as a composite of cardiac death, TV myocardial infarction, or TV revascularization. Results: Out of the 1498 enrolled patients, 529 (35.3%) experienced a POCE during the 10-year follow-up. Independent predictors of POCE were age, diabetes mellitus, previous myocardial infarction, peripheral arterial disease, and multivessel coronary disease. The first event was a TVF in 296 patients and was a non-TVF in 233 patients. No significant differences were observed between TVF-first and non–TVF-first patients in terms of subsequent POCE (21.7% vs 39.3%, time ratio 1.79; 95%CI, 0.87-3.67; P = .12) or its individual components. Conclusions: At the 10-year follow-up, approximately one-third of STEMI patients had experienced at least 1 POCE. Independent predictors of these events were age, diabetes, and more extensive atherosclerotic disease. The occurrence of a TVF or a non-TVF as the first event did not seem to influence subsequent outcomes. Trial registration number: NCT04462315.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)215-225
Number of pages11
JournalRevista Espanola de Cardiologia
Volume77
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Percutaneous coronary intervention
  • ST-segment myocardial infarction
  • Target vessel failure

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ten-year prognostic impact of target versus non-target vessel failure after STEMI. Insight from the EXAMINATION-EXTEND trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this