Temporal event-structure coding in developmental dyslexia: Evidence from explicit and implicit temporal processes

Mark A. Elliott, Louise M. Shanagher

    Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

    6 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    As an alternative to theories positing visual or phonological deficits it has been suggested that the aetiology of dyslexia takes the form of a temporal processing deficit that may refer to impairment in the functional connectivity of the processes involved in reading. Here we investigated this idea in an experimental task designed to measure simultaneity thresholds. Fifteen children diagnosed with developmental dyslexia, alongside a matched sample of 13 normal readers undertook a series of threshold determination procedures designed to locate visual simultaneity thresholds and to assess the influence of subthreshold synchrony or asynchrony upon these thresholds. While there were no significant differences in simultaneity thresholds between dyslexic and normal readers, indicating no evidence of an altered perception, or temporal quantization of events, the dyslexic readers reported simultaneity significantly less frequently than normal readers, with the reduction largely attributable presentation of a subthreshold asynchrony. The results are discussed in terms of a whole systems approach to maintaining information processing integrity.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)359-373
    Number of pages15
    JournalPsihologija
    Volume43
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2010

    Keywords

    • Dyslexia
    • Event simultaneity/asynchrony
    • Event-structure coding
    • Visual perception

    Authors (Note for portal: view the doc link for the full list of authors)

    • Authors
    • Elliott, MA;Shanagher, LM

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Temporal event-structure coding in developmental dyslexia: Evidence from explicit and implicit temporal processes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this