Taking on the institution: An autoethnographic account

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The over-representation of men and the under-representation of women in senior positions in academic institutions is a familier and deep-rooted problem. While gender inequality in Higher Education Institutions has multiple causes, recruitment and internal promotion practices are particu-larly potent contributors to inequality regimes. This paper contains an autoethnographic account based on my failure to secure promotion and my subsequent legal action. It offers a personalized account of the experience of gender discrimination, in order to illuminate aspects of the culture of the Higher Educational Institution that contribute to this problem, and the challenges inherent in changing it. The theoretical perspective includes notions of organizational culture as gendered, drawing on the works of Louise Morley and Georgina Waylen, Pat O’Connor, Louise Chappel and Teresa Rees, as well as Carol Agócs work on institutionalized resistance to change, and theories of hidden and invisible power. The paper is a personal narrative autoethnography with self-reflection, adopting an analytic/interpretive approach. Based on an analysis of publicly available documents, personal journaling and media material, I identify four themes; (1) Slow Fuse burning, (2) From indifference to resistance, (3) Fixing me/Fixing women, (4) Solidarity. I conclude with reflections on the importance of seeing gender inequality and discrimination when it occurs and the importance of data in creating greater transparency that facilitates ‘seeing’. I also consider the importance of female anger and the importance of female solidarity.

Original languageEnglish
Article number39
JournalSocieties
Volume11
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2021

Keywords

  • Gender equality
  • Higher education
  • Institutionalized resistance
  • Organizational culture

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Taking on the institution: An autoethnographic account'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this