Systematic review and meta-analysis of preoperative antisepsis with chlorhexidine versus povidone-iodine in clean-contaminated surgery

A. Noorani, N. Rabey, S. R. Walsh, R. J. Davies

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Review articlepeer-review

176 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Surgical-site infection increases morbidity, mortality and financial burden. The preferred topical antiseptic agent (chlorhexidine or povidone-iodine) for preoperative skin cleansing is unclear. Methods: A meta-analysis of clinical trials was conducted to determine whether preoperative antisepsis with chlorhexidine or povidone-iodine reduced surgical-site infection in clean-contaminated surgery. Results: The systematic review identified six eligible studies, containing 5031 patients. Chlorhexidine reduced postoperative surgical-site infection compared with povidone-iodine (pooled odds ratio 0.68, 95 per cent confidence interval 0. 50 to 0. 94; P = 0.019). Conclusion: Chlorhexidine should be used preferentially for preoperative antisepsis in clean-contaminated surgery.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1614-1620
Number of pages7
JournalBritish Journal of Surgery
Volume97
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Systematic review and meta-analysis of preoperative antisepsis with chlorhexidine versus povidone-iodine in clean-contaminated surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this