Spokes or strokes? Clientelism and cycling funding in Ireland

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Clientelism, pork-barrel politics and ‘pulling a stroke’ are important topics in Irish political science, and growing evidence demonstrates that Irish government ministers deliver disproportionate capital investments for their constituencies in grant allocations. Smarter Travel, a new policy area in the sustainability agenda, began providing capital funding for cycling projects in 2012 and offers a study of clientelism in a new field. This article shows that in 2012 and 2014, the Minister with responsibility for commuter and public transport overruled civil servant recommendations to fund four cycling-based projects in his own constituency and in another constituency immediately prior to a Dáil by-election. The allocation of €27 million in National Cycle Network and Active Travel Towns funding is examined using Freedom of Information requests and the role of the Minister is highlighted. This study of pork in a new field reveals some of the dynamics between the civil service and a government minister and suggests a process of manipulating funding schemes to deliver largesse. Clientelism and the consequent distortion of funding objectives are shown to be in conflict with the effective implementation of cycling policies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)443-460
Number of pages18
JournalIrish Political Studies
Volume31
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2016

Keywords

  • Clientelism
  • cycling funding
  • pork-barrel
  • stroke politics
  • transport policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Spokes or strokes? Clientelism and cycling funding in Ireland'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this