Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Solidarity and the Encapsulated and Divided Histories of Health and Human Rights

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

Abstract

This article examines the central but neglected principle of solidarity in human rights, health and bioethics, a concept subject to contention, evasion and confusion. It addresses the general ambivalence toward solidarity within law, philosophy and politics by discussing solidaritys co-evolution with inegalitarian encapsulations and divisions of human rights. It argues that a renewed conception of solidarity is essential to meet increasingly salient ethical demands, as gender equality and the individualization of responsibilities coincide with deficits of care and collective responsibility. Questions of embodiedness, (inter)dependence, care and asymmetry are neglected by dominant liberal approaches, but are key to rethinking solidarity.
Original languageEnglish (Ireland)
JournalLAWS
Volume4
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2015

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Authors (Note for portal: view the doc link for the full list of authors)

  • Authors
  • Su-Ming Khoo

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Solidarity and the Encapsulated and Divided Histories of Health and Human Rights'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this