TY - JOUR
T1 - Social Work Practices
T2 - Silences and elisions in the plan to 'transform' the lives of children 'looked after' in England
AU - Garrett, Paul Michael
PY - 2008/8
Y1 - 2008/8
N2 - This paper critically examines the government's proposals for the reform of services for children in public care, or 'looked after', in England and, more specifically, the proposal to set up Social Work Practices (SWPs, see Note 1). These are envisaged as groups of social workers, commissioned by but independent of local authorities. The changes have been mapped out by a Green Paper Care Matters: Transforming the Lives of Children and Young People in Care published in October 2006, a subsequent working group report, and Care Matters: Time for Change, a White Paper published in June 2007. This was followed, in November, by the publication of the Children and Young Persons' Bill. It is argued that there are, at least, two issues which could be focused on by those seeking to counter moves to introduce SWPs. First, the enhanced role being given to private sector providers because, it is maintained, public services provided by local authorities are unambiguously 'failing' children. Second, the fact that the views of parents and 'looked after' children are mostly excluded from the dominant and 'official' discourse on SWPs.
AB - This paper critically examines the government's proposals for the reform of services for children in public care, or 'looked after', in England and, more specifically, the proposal to set up Social Work Practices (SWPs, see Note 1). These are envisaged as groups of social workers, commissioned by but independent of local authorities. The changes have been mapped out by a Green Paper Care Matters: Transforming the Lives of Children and Young People in Care published in October 2006, a subsequent working group report, and Care Matters: Time for Change, a White Paper published in June 2007. This was followed, in November, by the publication of the Children and Young Persons' Bill. It is argued that there are, at least, two issues which could be focused on by those seeking to counter moves to introduce SWPs. First, the enhanced role being given to private sector providers because, it is maintained, public services provided by local authorities are unambiguously 'failing' children. Second, the fact that the views of parents and 'looked after' children are mostly excluded from the dominant and 'official' discourse on SWPs.
KW - Looked after children
KW - Neoliberalism
KW - Parents
KW - Private sector
KW - Social work practices
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/64549150444
U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2206.2008.00555.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2206.2008.00555.x
M3 - Article
SN - 1356-7500
VL - 13
SP - 311
EP - 318
JO - Child and Family Social Work
JF - Child and Family Social Work
IS - 3
ER -