So you think you're agile?

Research output: Chapter in Book or Conference Publication/ProceedingConference Publicationpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Some agile projects succeed, some fail miserably. Research shows that time does not necessarily cure such ills and there can be many complex underlying reasons. Evaluating the ways agility is supported across three supposedly agile projects reveals a myriad of organizational, human and political issues. Using a novel approach to assess agile projects from first principles, this paper outlines several key findings and recommendations beyond mere compliance to textbook methods.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationAgile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming - 11th International Conference, XP 2010, Proceedings
PublisherSpringer-Verlag
Pages315-324
Number of pages10
ISBN (Print)9783642130533
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010
Event11th International Conference on Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming, XP 2010 - Trondheim, Norway
Duration: 1 Jun 20104 Jun 2010

Publication series

NameLecture Notes in Business Information Processing
Volume48 LNBIP
ISSN (Print)1865-1348

Conference

Conference11th International Conference on Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming, XP 2010
Country/TerritoryNorway
CityTrondheim
Period1/06/104/06/10

Keywords

  • Adoption
  • Agile methods
  • Assessment
  • Assimilation
  • Experiences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'So you think you're agile?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this