Small-bowel imaging in Crohn's disease: a prospective, blinded, 4-way comparison trial

  • Craig A. Solem
  • , Edward V. Loftus
  • , Joel G. Fletcher
  • , Todd H. Baron
  • , Christopher J. Gostout
  • , Bret T. Petersen
  • , William J. Tremaine
  • , Laurence J. Egan
  • , William A. Faubion
  • , Kenneth W. Schroeder
  • , Darrell S. Pardi
  • , Karen A. Hanson
  • , Debra A. Jewell
  • , John M. Barlow
  • , Jeff L. Fidler
  • , James E. Huprich
  • , C. Daniel Johnson
  • , W. Scott Harmsen
  • , Alan R. Zinsmeister
  • , William J. Sandborn

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

332 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: With the introduction of new techniques to image the small bowel, there remains uncertainty about their role for diagnosing Crohn's disease. Objective: To assess the sensitivity and specificity of capsule endoscopy (CE), CT enterography (CTE), ileocolonoscopy, and small-bowel follow-through (SBFT) in the diagnosis of small bowel Crohn's disease. Methods: Prospective, blinded trial. Setting: Inflammatory bowel disease clinic at an academic medical center. Patients: Known or suspected Crohn's disease. Exclusion criteria included known abdominal abscess and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use. Partial small-bowel obstruction (PSBO) at CTE excluded patients from subsequent CE. Interventions: Patients underwent all 4 tests over a 4-day period. Main Outcome Measurements: Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of each test to detect active small-bowel Crohn's disease. The criterion standard was a consensus diagnosis based upon clinical presentation and all 4 studies. Results: Forty-one CTE examinations were performed. Seven patients (17%) had an asymptomatic PSBO. Forty patients underwent colonoscopy, 38 had SBFT studies, and 28 had CE examinations. Small-bowel Crohn's disease was active in 51%, absent in 42%, inactive in 5%, and suspicious in 2% of patients. The sensitivity of CE for detecting active small-bowel Crohn's disease was 83%, not significantly higher than CTE (83%), ileocolonoscopy (74%), or SBFT (65%). However, the specificity of CE (53%) was significantly lower than the other tests (P < .05). One patient developed a transient PSBO due to CE, but no patients had retained capsules. Limitation: Use of a consensus clinical diagnosis as the criterion standard-but this is how Crohn's disease is diagnosed in practice. Conclusions: The sensitivity of CE for active small-bowel Crohn's disease was not significantly different from CTE, ileocolonoscopy, or SBFT. However, lower specificity and the need for preceding small-bowel radiography (due to the high frequency of asymptomatic PSBO) may limit the utility of CE as a first-line test for Crohn's disease.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)255-266
Number of pages12
JournalGastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume68
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2008

Authors (Note for portal: view the doc link for the full list of authors)

  • Authors
  • Solem, CA;Loftus, EV;Fletcher, JG;Baron, TH;Gostout, CJ;Petersen, BT;Tremaine, WJ;Egan, LJ;Faubion, WA;Schroeder, KW;Pardi, DS;Hanson, KA;Jewell, DA;Barlow, JM;Fidler, JL;Huprich, JE;Johnson, CD;Harmsen, WS;Zinsmeister, AR;Sandborn, WJ

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Small-bowel imaging in Crohn's disease: a prospective, blinded, 4-way comparison trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this