Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Size specific indoor aerosol deposition measurements and derived I/O concentrations ratios

  • Technical University of Denmark

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

89 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The process of aerosol deposition on indoor surfaces has implications for human exposure to particulate contaminants of both indoor and outdoor origin. In the radiological context, current accident models assume a uniform Dose Reduction Factor (DRF) of 0.5 for indoor residence during the outdoor passage of a radioactive aerosol cloud. To examine the general validity of this figure, indoor aerosol deposition have been determined in four houses. Monodisperse aerosol particles, with mass median aerodynamic diameters (MMAD) in the range 0.5-5.5 μm, were labelled with neutron-activatable tracers and dispersed in unfurnished and furnished rooms; the decay rate of the particles was then inferred from analysis of sequential air samples. Allowing for the differences in furnishing and level of occupancy between the tests, consistent aerosol deposition velocities were determined and, for furnished rooms, the following empirical expression, relating the particles' MMAD (d(p), in μm) to the indoor deposition velocity (v(d), in 10-4 m s-1) was derived: v(d) = 0.48 + 0.60 d(p) (r = 0.93). Using this formula, particle size-specific DRFs were determined and found to be in good agreement with previous measurements of I/O ratios for fine and coarse particles. It was concluded that, for realistic dose estimates, a radioisotope-specific factor may be merited.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2193-2203
Number of pages11
JournalAtmospheric Environment
Volume31
Issue number15
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 1997

Keywords

  • Aerosol deposition
  • Dose reduction factor
  • Indoor
  • Measurements

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Size specific indoor aerosol deposition measurements and derived I/O concentrations ratios'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this