Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Single or multiple arterial bypass graft surgery vs. percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease

  • Piroze M. Davierwala
  • , Chao Gao
  • , Daniel J.F.M. Thuijs
  • , Rutao Wang
  • , Hironori Hara
  • , Masafumi Ono
  • , Thilo Noack
  • , Scot Garg
  • , Neil O'Leary
  • , Milan Milojevic
  • , Arie Pieter Kappetein
  • , Marie Claude Morice
  • , Michael J. Mack
  • , Robert Jan Van Geuns
  • , David R. Holmes
  • , Mario Gaudino
  • , David P. Taggart
  • , Yoshinobu Onuma
  • , Friedrich Wilhelm Mohr
  • , Patrick W. Serruys
  • Peter Munk Cardiac Centre
  • Xijing Hospital
  • Radboud University
  • University of Galway
  • Erasmus MC
  • University of Amsterdam
  • Heart Centre Leipzig
  • Royal Blackburn Hospital
  • Hôpital Privé Jacques Cartier
  • Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas
  • Mayo Clinic
  • Joan and Sanford I. Weill Department of Medicine
  • University of Oxford

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare long-term all-cause mortality between patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using multiple (MAG) or single arterial grafting (SAG). Methods and results: The current study is a post hoc analysis of the SYNTAX Extended Survival Study, which compared PCI with CABG in patients with three-vessel (3VD) and/or left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD) and evaluated survival with ≥10 years of follow-up. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at maximum follow-up (median 11.9 years) assessed in the as-treated population. Of the 1743 patients, 901 (51.7%) underwent PCI, 532 (30.5%) received SAG, and 310 (17.8%) had MAG. At maximum follow-up, all-cause death occurred in 305 (33.9%), 175 (32.9%), and 70 (22.6%) patients in the PCI, SAG, and MAG groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Multiple arterial grafting [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.49-0.89], but not SAG (adjusted HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.67-1.03), was associated with significantly lower all-cause mortality compared with PCI. In patients with 3VD, both MAG (adjusted HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.37-0.81) and SAG (adjusted HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.50-0.91) were associated with significantly lower mortality than PCI, whereas in LMCAD patients, no significant differences between PCI and MAG (adjusted HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.56-1.46) or SAG (adjusted HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.81-1.53) were observed. In patients with revascularization of all three major myocardial territories, a positive correlation was observed between the number of myocardial territories receiving arterial grafts and survival (Ptrend = 0.003). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that MAG might be the more desirable configuration for CABG to achieve lower long-term all-cause mortality than PCI in patients with 3VD and/or LMCAD. Trial registration: Registered on clinicaltrial.gov. SYNTAXES: NCT03417050 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03417050); SYNTAX: NCT00114972 (https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00114972).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1334-1344
Number of pages11
JournalEuropean Heart Journal
Volume43
Issue number13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2022

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Coronary artery bypass grafting
  • Multiple arterial grafting
  • Percutaneous coronary intervention
  • Single arterial grafting

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Single or multiple arterial bypass graft surgery vs. percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this