Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Simple method for comparing reliability of two serum tumour markers in breast carcinoma.

  • D P O'Brien
  • , D B Gough
  • , R Skehill
  • , H Grimes
  • , H Frederick Given

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims-To compare the two breast tumour markers, CA15-3 and mucinous-like carcinoma associated antigen (MCA), using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Methods-One hundred and ninety six patients ''presenting'' with breast carcinoma had serum CA15-3 and MCA concentrations measured. Results-Using these markers as indicators of stage IV disease at the recommended laboratory level, true positive rates (TPR) and false positive rates (FPR) were obtained as follows: CA15-3 TPR = 75%, FPR = 7.4%, MCA TPR = 80%, FPR= 59.1%. By increasing the CA15-3 cutoff level to 45 U/ml, a TPR and FPR of 75% and 0.6%, respectively were obtained. By increasing the MCA cutoff level to 23 U/ml, a TPR and FPR of 65% and 2.3%, respectively, were obtained. Conclusions-Using ROC curve analysis shows that CA15-3 is a superior indicator of metastatic breast disease than MCA at recommended laboratory levels, and by altering the cutoff points, the specificity and sensitivity for both these markers can be improved.
Original languageEnglish (Ireland)
JournalJournal of Clinical Pathology
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 1994

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Simple method for comparing reliability of two serum tumour markers in breast carcinoma.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this