Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Sex Differences in 10-Year Outcomes Following STEMI: A Subanalysis From the EXAMINATION-EXTEND Trial

  • Rami Gabani
  • , Francesco Spione
  • , Victor Arevalos
  • , Nadine Grima Sopesens
  • , Luis Ortega-Paz
  • , Josep Gomez-Lara
  • , Victor Jimenez-Diaz
  • , Marcelo Jimenez
  • , Pilar Jiménez-Quevedo
  • , Roberto Diletti
  • , Javier Pineda
  • , Gianluca Campo
  • , Antonio Silvestro
  • , Jaume Maristany
  • , Xacobe Flores
  • , Loreto Oyarzabal
  • , Guillermo Bastos-Fernandez
  • , Andrés Iñiguez
  • , Antonio Serra
  • , Javier Escaned
  • Alfonso Ielasi, Maurizio Tespili, Mattie Lenzen, Nieves Gonzalo, Pascual Bordes, Matteo Tebaldi, Simone Biscaglia, Soheil Al-Shaibani, Rafael Romaguera, Joan Antoni Gomez-Hospital, Josep Rodes-Cabau, Patrick W. Serruys, Manel Sabaté, Salvatore Brugaletta
  • Hospital Clínic
  • University of Naples Federico II
  • University of Barcelona
  • University of Florida College of Medicine
  • Bellvitge University Hospital-IDIBELL
  • Hospital Alvaro Cunqueiro
  • SERGAS-UVIGO
  • Hospital de la Santa Creu I
  • Hospital Clinico San Carlos
  • Thoraxcenter
  • Hospital General of Alicante
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Ferrara
  • University Hospital Bolognini Seriate
  • Hospital Son Dureta
  • Hospital Universitario
  • Imperial College London
  • ISCIII

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Short-term outcomes following ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in women are worse than in men, with a higher mortality rate. It is unknown whether sex plays a role in very long term outcomes. Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess whether very long term outcomes following STEMI treatment are influenced by sex. Methods: EXAMINATION-EXTEND (10-Year Follow-Up of the EXAMINATION Trial) was an investigator-driven 10-year follow-up of the EXAMINATION (A Clinical Evaluation of Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stents in the Treatment of Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction) trial, which randomly 1:1 assigned 1,498 patients with STEMI to receive either everolimus-eluting stents or bare-metal stents. The present study was a subanalysis according to sex. The primary endpoint was the composite patient-oriented endpoint (all-cause death, any myocardial infarction, or any revascularization) at 10 years. Secondary endpoints were individual components of the primary endpoint. All endpoints were adjusted for age. Results: Among 1,498 patients with STEMI, 254 (17%) were women. Overall, women were older, with more arterial hypertension and less smoking history than men. At 10 years, no difference was observed between women and men for the patient-oriented composite endpoint (40.6% vs 34.2%; adjusted HR: 1.14; 95% CI: 0.91-1.42; P = 0.259). There was a trend toward higher all-cause death in women vs men (27.6% vs 19.4%; adjusted HR: 1.30; 95% CI: 0.99-1.71; P = 0.063), with no difference in cardiac death or other endpoints. Conclusions: At very long term follow-up, there were no differences in the combined patient-oriented endpoint between women and men, with a trend toward higher all-cause death in women not driven by cardiac death. The present findings underline the need for focused personalized medicine in women after percutaneous revascularization aimed at both cardiovascular and sex-specific risk factor control and targeted treatment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1965-1973
Number of pages9
JournalJACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume15
Issue number19
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Oct 2022

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • drug-eluting stent(s)
  • percutaneous coronary intervention
  • sex
  • STEMI

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sex Differences in 10-Year Outcomes Following STEMI: A Subanalysis From the EXAMINATION-EXTEND Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this