TY - JOUR
T1 - Serial Assessment of Tissue Precursors and Progression of Coronary Calcification Analyzed by Fusion of IVUS and OCT
T2 - 5-Year Follow-Up of Scaffolded and Nonscaffolded Arteries
AU - Zeng, Yaping
AU - Tateishi, Hiroki
AU - Cavalcante, Rafael
AU - Tenekecioglu, Erhan
AU - Suwannasom, Pannipa
AU - Sotomi, Yohei
AU - Collet, Carlos
AU - Nie, Shaoping
AU - Jonker, Hans
AU - Dijkstra, Jouke
AU - Radu, Maria D.
AU - Räber, Lorenz
AU - McClean, Dougal R.
AU - van Geuns, Robert Jan
AU - Christiansen, Evald H.
AU - Fahrni, Therese
AU - Koolen, Jacques
AU - Onuma, Yoshinobu
AU - Bruining, Nico
AU - Serruys, Patrick W.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 American College of Cardiology Foundation
PY - 2017/10
Y1 - 2017/10
N2 - Objectives The aim of this study was to assess calcium growth with fused grayscale intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), IVUS–virtual histology, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) from baseline to 5-year follow-up in patients treated with bioresorbable vascular scaffolds. Background IVUS and OCT have individual strengths in assessing plaque composition and volume. Fusion of images obtained using these methods could potentially aid in coronary plaque assessment. Methods Anatomic landmarks and endoluminal radiopaque markers were used to fuse OCT and IVUS images and match baseline and follow-up. Results Seventy-two IVUS–virtual histology and OCT paired matched cross-sectional in- and out-scaffold segments were fused at baseline and follow-up. In total, 46 calcified plaques at follow-up were detected using the fusion method (33 in-scaffold, 13 out-scaffold), showing either calcium progression (52.2%) or de novo calcifications (47.8%). On OCT, calcification volume increased from baseline to follow-up by 2.3 ± 2.4 mm3 (p = 0.001). The baseline virtual histologic tissue precursors of dense calcium at follow-up were necrotic core in 73.9% and fibrous or fibrofatty plaque in 10.9%. In 15.2%, calcium was already present at baseline. Precursors on OCT were lipid pool in 71.2%, fibrous plaque in 4.3%, and fibrocalcific plaque in 23.9%. Conclusions The use of OCT and IVUS fusion imaging shows similar calcium growth in- and out-scaffold segments. Necrotic core is the most frequent precursor of calcification. The scaffold resorption process creates a tissue layer that re-caps the calcified plaques.
AB - Objectives The aim of this study was to assess calcium growth with fused grayscale intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), IVUS–virtual histology, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) from baseline to 5-year follow-up in patients treated with bioresorbable vascular scaffolds. Background IVUS and OCT have individual strengths in assessing plaque composition and volume. Fusion of images obtained using these methods could potentially aid in coronary plaque assessment. Methods Anatomic landmarks and endoluminal radiopaque markers were used to fuse OCT and IVUS images and match baseline and follow-up. Results Seventy-two IVUS–virtual histology and OCT paired matched cross-sectional in- and out-scaffold segments were fused at baseline and follow-up. In total, 46 calcified plaques at follow-up were detected using the fusion method (33 in-scaffold, 13 out-scaffold), showing either calcium progression (52.2%) or de novo calcifications (47.8%). On OCT, calcification volume increased from baseline to follow-up by 2.3 ± 2.4 mm3 (p = 0.001). The baseline virtual histologic tissue precursors of dense calcium at follow-up were necrotic core in 73.9% and fibrous or fibrofatty plaque in 10.9%. In 15.2%, calcium was already present at baseline. Precursors on OCT were lipid pool in 71.2%, fibrous plaque in 4.3%, and fibrocalcific plaque in 23.9%. Conclusions The use of OCT and IVUS fusion imaging shows similar calcium growth in- and out-scaffold segments. Necrotic core is the most frequent precursor of calcification. The scaffold resorption process creates a tissue layer that re-caps the calcified plaques.
KW - bioresorbable vascular scaffold
KW - calcification
KW - fusion
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85015345363
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.11.016
DO - 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.11.016
M3 - Article
C2 - 28330651
AN - SCOPUS:85015345363
SN - 1936-878X
VL - 10
SP - 1151
EP - 1161
JO - JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
JF - JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
IS - 10
ER -