Screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ, 2008–2020: An observational study

Caitriona Kelly, Patricia Fitzpatrick, Cecily Quinn, Fidelma Flanagan, Alissa Connors, Aideen Larke, Therese Mooney, Maria Kennedy, Margaret Sheehan, Michael W. Bennett, Caroline Brodie, Ann O’Doherty

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the grade distribution of screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) diagnosed in Ireland, in the context of the clinical trials currently underway to determine if active surveillance is a feasible management option for low-risk DCIS. Setting: BreastCheck is the national breast screening programme in Ireland, offering screening to women aged 50 to 69 every two years. Methods: This study was a secondary analysis of data collected by BreastCheck on all screen-detected DCIS diagnosed in the 12 years of nationwide screening. Incidence and detection rates were calculated. Descriptive analysis of the cases was performed and, for comparative analysis, grade of DCIS was analysed as a binary variable (high vs. low/intermediate) in keeping with the inclusion criteria for active surveillance trials. Analysis was performed in IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences, version 26. Results: Between 2008 and 2020, 2240 women were diagnosed with DCIS through BreastCheck; 876 (39.1%) were low/intermediate-grade. The overall incidence rate has remained relatively stable during this period. Women with low/intermediate-grade DCIS were younger than women with high-grade DCIS (56 (interquartile range: 56-61) years v 57 (interquartile range: 53–61) years; p < 0.001). They were also more likely to have been diagnosed at an initial screening episode compared with those who had high-grade lesions (42.5% v 29.0%; p < 0.001). Conclusion: If current clinical trials recommend active surveillance as a feasible option for DCIS, up to 40% of women with screen-detected DCIS may be eligible. These women are younger and often diagnosed on initial screening episode, so may require longer active follow-up.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)172-177
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Medical Screening
Volume29
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2022
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)
  • low-risk
  • screening

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ, 2008–2020: An observational study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this