Scientific Ambition: The Relationship between Relational Frame Theory and Middle-Level Terms in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

Yvonne Barnes-Holmes, Ian Hussey, Ciara McEnteggart, Dermot Barnes-Holmes, Mairéad Foody

Research output: Chapter in Book or Conference Publication/ProceedingChapterpeer-review

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Most natural sciences aspire to a unified theory, such as Einstein's unified field theory that would specify how all space and time behave under changes in the parameters of the total field. This chapter presents a summary of the middle level terms that comprise the acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) hexaflex, as well as mention of a number of additional middle-level terms commonly used by ACT practitioners and researchers. It discusses how the contextual behavioral science (CBS) community can harness each of its elements to progress the science toward a unified theory. The chapter considers whether the recently proposed reticulating model can facilitate this agenda. It addresses the question of how successfully one can close the gap between relational frame theory (RFT) and ACT. The chapter considers future directions for basic research in the service of a unified theory for CBS. It argues strongly for the advancement of basic science.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Wiley Handbook of Contextual Behavioral Science
PublisherWiley-Blackwell
Pages365-382
Number of pages18
ISBN (Electronic)9781118489857
ISBN (Print)9781118489567
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Nov 2015
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Acceptance and commitment therapy
  • Contextual behavioral science
  • Relational frame theory
  • Unified field theory

Cite this