TY - JOUR
T1 - Routine sirolimus eluting stent implantation for unselected in-stent restenosis
T2 - Insights from the Rapamycin Eluting Stent Evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) registry
AU - Saia, F.
AU - Lemos, P. A.
AU - Arampatzis, C. A.
AU - Hoye, A.
AU - Degerlekin, M.
AU - Tanabe, K.
AU - Sianos, G.
AU - Smits, P. C.
AU - Van Der Giessen, W. J.
AU - De Feyter, P. J.
AU - Van Domburg, R. T.
AU - Serruys, P. W.
PY - 2004/10
Y1 - 2004/10
N2 - Objective: To assess the effectiveness of routine sirolimus eluting stent (SES) implantation for unselected patients with in-stent restenosis and to provide preliminary information about the angiographic outcome for lesion subgroups and for different in-stent restenosis patterns. Design: Prospective, single centre registry. Setting: Tertiary referral centre. Patients: 44 consecutive patients (53 lesions) without previous brachytherapy who were treated with SES for in-stent restenosis were evaluated. Routine angiographic follow up was obtained at six months and the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events was evaluated. Results: At baseline, 42% of the lesions were focal, 21% diffuse, 26% proliferative, and 11% total occlusions. Small vessel size (reference diameter ≤ 2.5 mm) was present in 49%, long lesions (> 20 mm) in 30%, treatment of bypass grafts in 13%, and bifurcation stenting in 18%. At follow up, post-SES restenosis was observed in 14.6%. No restenosis was observed in focal lesions. For more complex lesions, restenosis rates ranged from 20-25%. At the one year follow up, the incidence of death was 0, myocardial infarction 4.7% (n = 2), and target lesion revascularisation 16.3% (n = 7). The target lesion was revascularised because of restenosis in 11.6% (n = 5). Conclusions: Routine SES implantation is highly effective for focal in-stent restenosis and appears to be a promising strategy for more complex patterns of restenosis.
AB - Objective: To assess the effectiveness of routine sirolimus eluting stent (SES) implantation for unselected patients with in-stent restenosis and to provide preliminary information about the angiographic outcome for lesion subgroups and for different in-stent restenosis patterns. Design: Prospective, single centre registry. Setting: Tertiary referral centre. Patients: 44 consecutive patients (53 lesions) without previous brachytherapy who were treated with SES for in-stent restenosis were evaluated. Routine angiographic follow up was obtained at six months and the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events was evaluated. Results: At baseline, 42% of the lesions were focal, 21% diffuse, 26% proliferative, and 11% total occlusions. Small vessel size (reference diameter ≤ 2.5 mm) was present in 49%, long lesions (> 20 mm) in 30%, treatment of bypass grafts in 13%, and bifurcation stenting in 18%. At follow up, post-SES restenosis was observed in 14.6%. No restenosis was observed in focal lesions. For more complex lesions, restenosis rates ranged from 20-25%. At the one year follow up, the incidence of death was 0, myocardial infarction 4.7% (n = 2), and target lesion revascularisation 16.3% (n = 7). The target lesion was revascularised because of restenosis in 11.6% (n = 5). Conclusions: Routine SES implantation is highly effective for focal in-stent restenosis and appears to be a promising strategy for more complex patterns of restenosis.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/4644354546
U2 - 10.1136/hrt.2003.025536
DO - 10.1136/hrt.2003.025536
M3 - Article
C2 - 15367519
AN - SCOPUS:4644354546
SN - 1355-6037
VL - 90
SP - 1183
EP - 1188
JO - Heart
JF - Heart
IS - 10
ER -