Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Risk of major congenital malformations or perinatal or neonatal death with insulin detemir versus other basal insulins in pregnant women with preexisting diabetes: The real-world evolve study

  • Elisabeth R. Mathiesen
  • , Norsiah Ali
  • , Amra C. Alibegovic
  • , Eleni Anastasiou
  • , Katarzyna Cypryk
  • , Harold De Valk
  • , Jorge Dores
  • , Fidelma Dunne
  • , Mari Anne Gall
  • , Santiago Duran Garcia
  • , Hèlène P. Hanaire
  • , Lise Lotte N. Husemoen
  • , Marina Ivanišević
  • , Hans Peter Kempe
  • , David R. McCance
  • , Peter Damm
  • University Hospital of Copenhagen - Rigshospitalet
  • University of Copenhagen
  • Masjid Tanah Health Clinic
  • Novo Nordisk A/S
  • Alexandra Hospital
  • Medical University of Lodz
  • University Medical Centre Utrecht
  • Centro Hospitalar e Universitário do Porto
  • Endo-Diabesidad Cl-ınica Dur-an & Asociados
  • University Hospital of Toulouse
  • Clinical Hospital Center Zagreb
  • Centre for Diabetes and Nutrition Ludwigshafen
  • Royal Victoria Hospital Belfast

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To compare the risk of severe adverse pregnancy complications in women with preexisting diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Multinational, prospective cohort study to assess the prevalence of newborns free from major congenital malformations or perinatal or neonatal death (primary end point) following treatment with insulin detemir (detemir) versus other basal insulins. RESULTS Of 1,457 women included, 727 received detemir and 730 received other basal insulins. The prevalence of newborns free from major congenital malformations or perinatal or neonatal death was similar between detemir (97.0%) and other basal insulins (95.5%) (crude risk difference 0.015 [95% CI -0.01, 0.04]; adjusted risk difference -0.003 [95% CI -0.03, 0.03]). The crude prevalence of one or more congenital malformations (major plus minor) was 9.4% vs. 12.6%, with a similar risk difference before (-0.032 [95% CI -0.064, 0.000]) and after (-0.036 [95% CI -0.081, 0.009]) adjustment for confounders. Crude data showed lower maternal HbA1c during the first trimester (6.5% vs. 6.7% [48 vs. 50 mmol/mol]; estimated mean difference -0.181 [95% CI -0.300, -0.062]) and the second trimester (6.1% vs. 6.3%[43 vs. 45mmol/mol]; -0.139 [95% CI -0.232, -0.046]) and a lower prevalence of major hypoglycemia (6.0% vs. 9.0%; risk difference -0.030 [95% CI -0.058, -0.002]), preeclampsia (6.4% vs. 10.0%; -0.036 [95% CI -0.064, -0.007]), and stillbirth (0.4% vs. 1.8%; -0.013 [95% CI -0.024, -0.002]) with detemir compared with other basal insulins. However, differences were not significant postadjustment. CONCLUSIONS Insulin detemir was associated with a similar risk to other basal insulins of major congenital malformations, perinatal or neonatal death, hypoglycemia, preeclampsia, and stillbirth.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2069-2077
Number of pages9
JournalDiabetes Care
Volume44
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Risk of major congenital malformations or perinatal or neonatal death with insulin detemir versus other basal insulins in pregnant women with preexisting diabetes: The real-world evolve study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this