Abstract
The present review concerns the relative efficacy of imaginal and in vivo flooding in the treatment of debilitating fear. It has generally been concluded that in vivo flooding is superior to flooding in imagery. However, in the present review, serious methodological weaknesses were found to exist in a number of studies which have been frequently cited as demonstrating the superiority of in vivo flooding. In addition, recent empirical studies are reviewed which cast doubt on the belief that in vivo flooding is superior to imaginal flooding. Overall, little support was found for recent recommendations advocating the abandonment of methods of imaginal exposure in the treatment of clinical fear.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 183-191 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Behavioural Psychotherapy |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 1986 |
| Externally published | Yes |