Relational frame theory y equivalencia estimular: Aspectos conceptuales y metodológicos

Translated title of the contribution: Relational frame theory and stimulus equivalence: Conceptual and procedural issues

Dermot Barnes-Holmes, Yvonne Barnes-Holmes, Paul M. Smeets, Veronica Cullinan, Geraldine Leader

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The article begins with a brief outline of the phenomenon of stimulus equivalence and its relationship to human verbal behavior. Relational Frame Theory is then outlined as a behavior-analytic account of both stimulus equivalence and human language. The experimental procedures that have typically been used to examine stimulus equivalence are then considered, before focusing on a series of studies that have developed two alternative procedures for analyzing equivalence class formation: the respondent-type training procedure and the precursor to the relational evaluation procedure. Relational Frame Theory is used to interpret the results that have arisen from these two methodologies. The article concludes that the empirical and theoretical analyses of stimulus equivalence and derived relations, more generally, will be enhanced considerably through the development of a wide range of experimental preparations.

Translated title of the contributionRelational frame theory and stimulus equivalence: Conceptual and procedural issues
Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)181-214
Number of pages34
JournalInternational Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy
Volume4
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2004

Keywords

  • Language
  • Precursor to the relational evaluation procedure
  • Relational frame theory
  • Respondent-type training procedure
  • Stimulus equivalence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Relational frame theory and stimulus equivalence: Conceptual and procedural issues'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this