Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Questioning habermasian social work: A note on some alternative theoretical resources

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It has been maintained that the social theory of Jurgen Habermas may assist social workers, and others, involved in child protection and related forms of endeavour. Whilst welcoming Hayes and Houston's willingness to utilize social theory, it is argued that Habermas' work is also problematic because of an unsatisfactory approach to issues connected to power differentials. In this context, it will be suggested that there is a need to be wary about the emphasis which Habermas places on the possibilities for unconstrained dialogue. Moreover, the work of a number of other European writers may help to illuminate key factors which Habermas neglects and also provide alternative theoretical resources for social workers and those working in associated fields.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)867-883
Number of pages17
JournalBritish Journal of Social Work
Volume39
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2009

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • Bakhtin
  • Bourdieu
  • Gramsci
  • Social theory

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Questioning habermasian social work: A note on some alternative theoretical resources'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this