Abstract
It has been maintained that the social theory of Jurgen Habermas may assist social workers, and others, involved in child protection and related forms of endeavour. Whilst welcoming Hayes and Houston's willingness to utilize social theory, it is argued that Habermas' work is also problematic because of an unsatisfactory approach to issues connected to power differentials. In this context, it will be suggested that there is a need to be wary about the emphasis which Habermas places on the possibilities for unconstrained dialogue. Moreover, the work of a number of other European writers may help to illuminate key factors which Habermas neglects and also provide alternative theoretical resources for social workers and those working in associated fields.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 867-883 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | British Journal of Social Work |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2009 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Bakhtin
- Bourdieu
- Gramsci
- Social theory
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Questioning habermasian social work: A note on some alternative theoretical resources'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver