Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Psychometric validation of the Internalised Stigma Scale for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (ISS-GDM): a cross-sectional study

  • Emma Davidsen
  • , Helle Terkildsen Maindal
  • , Karl Bang Christensen
  • , Peter Damm
  • , Molly Byrne
  • , Inger K. Dahl-Petersen
  • , Elisabeth R. Mathiesen
  • , Dorte M. Jensen
  • , Christina Vinter
  • , Ulla Kampmann
  • , Per G. Ovesen
  • , Karoline Kragelund Nielsen
    • Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen
    • Aarhus University
    • University of Copenhagen
    • University Hospital of Copenhagen - Rigshospitalet
    • Odense University Hospital

    Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Objectives To develop and validate the Internalised Stigma Scale for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (ISS-GDM), a questionnaire measuring self-reported internalised stigma among women with prior gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). We hypothesised that internalised GDM stigma could be reliably and validly assessed through a short psychometric instrument. Design Cross-sectional validation study. Setting Follow-up data from the Danish, multicentre Face-it trial for women with prior GDM and their families. Participants In total, 248 women completed the ISS-GDM approximately 1 year after their GDM affected pregnancy. Primary and secondary outcome measures The primary outcome was psychometric properties of the ISS-GDM, assessed using Cronbach’s alpha, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Rasch analysis (RA). Secondary outcomes included identification of item anomalies (local response dependence, differential item functioning). Results A large proportion of respondents endorsed statements reflecting self-disappointment, self-blame and an altered self-perception. Less endorsed statements included feeling inferior to other mothers or guilt towards family members due to GDM. The ISS-GDM demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties. CFA indicated that item 2 assessing self-perceived capabilities as a mother did not load onto the main factor, while CFA and RA identified local response dependence and differential item functioning by body mass index. After adjustments, a two-factor solution supported calculating a sum score of items 1 and 3–11, with item 2 retained as a stand-alone indicator of perceived parenting capabilities. The 10-item scale demonstrated acceptable reliability (Cronbach’s alpha=0.78). Conclusions The ISS-GDM is a reliable and valid tool for assessing internalised stigma among women with prior GDM. Our findings further suggest that a substantial proportion of women with prior GDM experience self-blame and an altered self-perception due to their diagnosis. The ISS-GDM scale enables research into its prevalence, severity and consequences.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article numbere098109
    JournalBMJ Open
    Volume16
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 7 Jan 2026

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Keywords

    • Diabetes in pregnancy
    • Factor Analysis
    • Questionnaires
    • Statistical
    • Stereotyping
    • Surveys

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Psychometric validation of the Internalised Stigma Scale for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (ISS-GDM): a cross-sectional study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this