Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Predictors of Conduction Disturbances Requiring New Permanent Pacemaker Implantation following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Using the Evolut Series

  • Mahmoud Abdelshafy
  • , Ahmed Elkoumy
  • , Hesham Elzomor
  • , Mohammad Abdelghani
  • , Ruth Campbell
  • , Ciara Kennedy
  • , William Kenny Gibson
  • , Simone Fezzi
  • , Philip Nolan
  • , Max Wagener
  • , Shahram Arsang-Jang
  • , Sameh K. Mohamed
  • , Mansour Mostafa
  • , Islam Shawky
  • , Briain MacNeill
  • , Angela McInerney
  • , Darren Mylotte
  • , Osama Soliman
    • Galway University Hospital
    • University of Galway
    • Al-Azhar University
    • Al-Azhar University
    • University of Amsterdam
    • Sfi Research Centre for Medical Devices
    • Discipline of Cardiology
    • Islamic Center of Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery
    • Discipline of Medicine
    • Clinical Science Institute

    Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

    9 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    (1) Background: Conduction disturbance requiring a new permanent pacemaker (PPM) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has traditionally been a common complication. New implantation techniques with self-expanding platforms have reportedly reduced the incidence of PPM. We sought to investigate the predictors of PPM at 30 days after TAVI using Evolut R/PRO/PRO+; (2) Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent TAVI with the Evolut platform between October 2019 and August 2022 at University Hospital Galway, Ireland, were included. Patients who had a prior PPM (n = 10), valve-in-valve procedures (n = 8) or received >1 valve during the index procedure (n = 3) were excluded. Baseline clinical, electrocardiographic (ECG), echocardiographic and multislice computed tomography (MSCT) parameters were analyzed. Pre-TAVI MSCT analysis included membranous septum (MS) length, a semi-quantitative calcification analysis of the aortic valve leaflets, left ventricular outflow tract, and mitral annulus. Furthermore, the implantation depth (ID) was measured from the final aortography. Multivariate binary logistic analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were used to identify independent predictors and the optimal MS and ID cutoff values to predict new PPM requirements, respectively; (3) Results: A total of 129 TAVI patients were included (age = 81.3 ± 5.3 years; 36% female; median EuroSCORE II 3.2 [2.0, 5.4]). Fifteen patients (11.6%) required PPM after 30 days. The patients requiring new PPM at 30 days were more likely to have a lower European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II, increased prevalence of right bundle branch block (RBBB) at baseline ECG, have a higher mitral annular calcification severity and have a shorter MS on preprocedural MSCT analysis, and have a ID, as shown on the final aortogram. From the multivariate analysis, pre-TAVI RBBB, MS length, and ID were shown to be predictors of new PPM. An MS length of <2.85 mm (AUC = 0.85, 95%CI: (0.77, 0.93)) and ID of >3.99 mm (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.79, (95% confidence interval (CI): (0.68, 0.90)) were found to be the optimal cut-offs for predicting new PPM requirements; (4) Conclusions: Membranous septum length and implantation depth were found to be independent predictors of new PPM post-TAVI with the Evolut platform. Patient-specific implantation depth could be used to mitigate the requirement for new PPM.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number4835
    JournalJournal of Clinical Medicine
    Volume12
    Issue number14
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 22 Jul 2023

    Keywords

    • TAVI
    • computed tomography
    • conduction disturbance
    • membranous septum
    • pacemaker implantation

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Predictors of Conduction Disturbances Requiring New Permanent Pacemaker Implantation following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Using the Evolut Series'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this