TY - JOUR
T1 - PRECISE-DAPT score for bleeding risk prediction in patients on dual or single antiplatelet regimens
T2 - Insights from the GLOBAL LEADERS and GLASSY
AU - The GLASSY Investigators
AU - Gragnano, Felice
AU - Heg, Dik
AU - Franzone, Anna
AU - McFadden, Eugène P.
AU - Leonardi, Sergio
AU - Piccolo, Raffaele
AU - Vranckx, Pascal
AU - Branca, Mattia
AU - Serruys, Patrick W.
AU - Benit, Edouard
AU - Liebetrau, Christoph
AU - Janssens, Luc
AU - Ferrario, Maurizio
AU - Zurakowski, Aleksander
AU - Diletti, Roberto
AU - Dominici, Marcello
AU - Huber, Kurt
AU - Slagboom, Ton
AU - Buszman, Paweł
AU - Bolognese, Leonardo
AU - Tumscitz, Carlo
AU - Bryniarski, Krzysztof
AU - Aminian, Adel
AU - Vrolix, Mathias
AU - Petrov, Ivo
AU - Garg, Scot
AU - Naber, Christoph
AU - Prokopczuk, Janusz
AU - Hamm, Christian
AU - Steg, Philippe Gabriel
AU - Jüni, Peter
AU - Windecker, Stephan
AU - Valgimigli, Marco
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2020.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Aims The five-item PRECISE-DAPT, integrating age, haemoglobin, white-blood-cell count, creatinine clearance, and prior bleeding, predicts bleeding risk in patients on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after stent implantation. We sought to assess whether the bleeding risk prediction offered by the PRECISE-DAPT remains valid among patients receiving ticagrelor monotherapy from 1 month onwards after coronary stenting instead of standard DAPT and having or not having centrally adjudicated bleeding endpoints. Methods The PRECISE-DAPT was calculated in 14 928 and 7134 patients from GLOBAL LEADERS and GLASSY trials, re- and results spectively. The ability of the score to predict Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 3 or 5 bleeding was assessed and compared among patients on ticagrelor monotherapy (experimental strategy) or standard DAPT (reference strategy) from 1 month after drug-eluting stent implantation. Bleeding endpoints were investigator-reported or centrally adjudicated in GLOBAL LEADERS and GLASSY, respectively. At 2 years, the c-indexes for the score among patients treated with the experimental or reference strategy were 0.67 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.63-0.71] vs. 0.63 (95% CI: 0.59-0.67) in GLOBAL LEADERS (P = 0.27), and 0.67 (95% CI: 0.61-0.73) vs. 0.66 (95% CI: 0.61-0.72) in GLASSY (P = 0.88). Decision curve analysis showed net benefit using the PRECISE-DAPT to guide bleeding risk assessment under both treatment strategies. Results were consistent between investigator-reported and adjudicated endpoints and using the simplified four-item PRECISE-DAPT. Conclusion The PRECISE-DAPT offers a prediction model that proved similarly effective to predict clinically relevant bleeding among patients on ticagrelor monotherapy from 1 month after coronary stenting compared with standard DAPT and appears to be unaffected by the presence or absence of adjudicated bleeding endpoints.
AB - Aims The five-item PRECISE-DAPT, integrating age, haemoglobin, white-blood-cell count, creatinine clearance, and prior bleeding, predicts bleeding risk in patients on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after stent implantation. We sought to assess whether the bleeding risk prediction offered by the PRECISE-DAPT remains valid among patients receiving ticagrelor monotherapy from 1 month onwards after coronary stenting instead of standard DAPT and having or not having centrally adjudicated bleeding endpoints. Methods The PRECISE-DAPT was calculated in 14 928 and 7134 patients from GLOBAL LEADERS and GLASSY trials, re- and results spectively. The ability of the score to predict Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 3 or 5 bleeding was assessed and compared among patients on ticagrelor monotherapy (experimental strategy) or standard DAPT (reference strategy) from 1 month after drug-eluting stent implantation. Bleeding endpoints were investigator-reported or centrally adjudicated in GLOBAL LEADERS and GLASSY, respectively. At 2 years, the c-indexes for the score among patients treated with the experimental or reference strategy were 0.67 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.63-0.71] vs. 0.63 (95% CI: 0.59-0.67) in GLOBAL LEADERS (P = 0.27), and 0.67 (95% CI: 0.61-0.73) vs. 0.66 (95% CI: 0.61-0.72) in GLASSY (P = 0.88). Decision curve analysis showed net benefit using the PRECISE-DAPT to guide bleeding risk assessment under both treatment strategies. Results were consistent between investigator-reported and adjudicated endpoints and using the simplified four-item PRECISE-DAPT. Conclusion The PRECISE-DAPT offers a prediction model that proved similarly effective to predict clinically relevant bleeding among patients on ticagrelor monotherapy from 1 month after coronary stenting compared with standard DAPT and appears to be unaffected by the presence or absence of adjudicated bleeding endpoints.
KW - Aspirin
KW - Bleeding
KW - Dual antiplatelet therapy
KW - Percutaneous coronary intervention
KW - Ticagrelor
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85122779635
U2 - 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaa106
DO - 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaa106
M3 - Article
C2 - 32941620
AN - SCOPUS:85122779635
SN - 2055-6837
VL - 8
SP - 28
EP - 38
JO - European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy
JF - European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy
IS - 2
ER -