Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Power: A family resemblance concept: A 'family resemblance' concept

  • Mark Haugaard

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

147 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

While Lukes view of power as an essentially contested concept is a move in the right direction, it does not go far enough because it falls short of arguing for a plural view of power. Power constitutes a family resemblance concept, with family members forming complex relationships within overlapping language games. Members include, among others: episodic power, dispositional power, systemic power, power to, power over, empowerment, legitimate power and domination. This argument does not entail relativism or that anything goes, as all usages have to be justified as conceptual tools, whereby pragmatic criteria of usefulness, rather than essence, define better or worse usage. When moving language games, the relationship between signifier and referent changes, which leads to confusion, unless the family resemblance nature of power is understood. In the literature, the most significant confusion has taken place between sociological analytic and normative political theory language games.
Original languageEnglish (Ireland)
Pages (from-to)419-438
Number of pages19
JournalEuropean Journal Of Cultural Studies
Volume13
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2010

Keywords

  • domination
  • essentially contested concepts
  • family resemblance concepts
  • legitimacy
  • power

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Power: A family resemblance concept: A 'family resemblance' concept'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this