TY - JOUR
T1 - Population screening, monitoring and surveillance for frailty
T2 - Three systematic reviews and a grey literature review
AU - Work Package 5 of the Joint Action ADVANTAGE
AU - Rodríguez-Laso, Ángel
AU - O'Caoimh, Rónán
AU - Galluzzo, Lucia
AU - Carcaillon-Bentata, Laure
AU - Beltzer, Nathalie
AU - Macijauskiene, Jurate
AU - Bacaicoa, Olatz Albaina
AU - Ciutan, Marius
AU - Hendry, Anne
AU - Samaniego, Luz López
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Istituto Superiore di Sanita. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Introduction. Little is known about programmes or interventions for the screening, monitoring and surveillance of frailty at population level. Methods. Three systematic searches and an opportunistic grey literature review from the countries participating in the ADVANTAGE Joint Action were performed. Results. Three studies reported local interventions to screen for frailty, two of them using a two-step screening and assessment method and one including monitoring activities. Another paper reviewed both providers' and participants' experiences of screening activities. Three on-going European projects and population-screening programmes in primary care await evaluation. An electronic Frailty Index for use with patients' primary care records has been recently validated. No study described systematic processes for the surveillance of frailty. Conclusions. There is insufficient evidence for the effectiveness of population-level screening, monitoring and surveillance of frailty. Development and evaluation of community-based two-step programmes including those that incorporate electronic health records, particularly in primary care, are now needed.
AB - Introduction. Little is known about programmes or interventions for the screening, monitoring and surveillance of frailty at population level. Methods. Three systematic searches and an opportunistic grey literature review from the countries participating in the ADVANTAGE Joint Action were performed. Results. Three studies reported local interventions to screen for frailty, two of them using a two-step screening and assessment method and one including monitoring activities. Another paper reviewed both providers' and participants' experiences of screening activities. Three on-going European projects and population-screening programmes in primary care await evaluation. An electronic Frailty Index for use with patients' primary care records has been recently validated. No study described systematic processes for the surveillance of frailty. Conclusions. There is insufficient evidence for the effectiveness of population-level screening, monitoring and surveillance of frailty. Development and evaluation of community-based two-step programmes including those that incorporate electronic health records, particularly in primary care, are now needed.
KW - Epidemiological monitoring
KW - Frailty
KW - Mass screening
KW - Program development
KW - Public health surveillance
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85054071733
U2 - 10.4415/ANN180313
DO - 10.4415/ANN180313
M3 - Review article
SN - 0021-2571
VL - 54
SP - 253
EP - 262
JO - Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanita
JF - Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanita
IS - 3
ER -