Planning in/for/with the public

Ulf Strohmayer

doi:10.13025/19812

Planning in/for/with the public

Ulf Strohmayer

Geography

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer) › Comment/debate

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This commentary traces key issues attaching to the use of the word ‘public’ within planning practices and theories. It argues for an alternative, non-binary engagement with public practices that may profit from being cast in a Foucauldian language and epistemology.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	55-58
Number of pages	4
Journal	Urban Planning
Volume	1
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.13025/19812 https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v1i1.599 https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v1i1.559
Publication status	Published - 2016

Keywords

Alternative practices
Dispositive
Foucauldian language
Public sphere

Access to Document

UP-2016Accepted author manuscript, 420 KBLicence: CC BY-NC-ND

Cite this

@article{fb80029090db4f76aace9610c9291514,

title = "Planning in/for/with the public",

abstract = "This commentary traces key issues attaching to the use of the word {\textquoteleft}public{\textquoteright} within planning practices and theories. It argues for an alternative, non-binary engagement with public practices that may profit from being cast in a Foucauldian language and epistemology.",

keywords = "Alternative practices, Dispositive, Foucauldian language, Public sphere",

author = "Ulf Strohmayer",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2016 by the authors; licensee Cogitatio (Lisbon, Portugal).",

year = "2016",

doi = "10.13025/19812",

language = "English",

volume = "1",

pages = "55--58",

journal = "Urban Planning",

issn = "2183-7635",

publisher = "Cogitatio Press",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Planning in/for/with the public

AU - Strohmayer, Ulf

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - This commentary traces key issues attaching to the use of the word ‘public’ within planning practices and theories. It argues for an alternative, non-binary engagement with public practices that may profit from being cast in a Foucauldian language and epistemology.

AB - This commentary traces key issues attaching to the use of the word ‘public’ within planning practices and theories. It argues for an alternative, non-binary engagement with public practices that may profit from being cast in a Foucauldian language and epistemology.

KW - Alternative practices

KW - Dispositive

KW - Foucauldian language

KW - Public sphere

UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10379/5658

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85044449145

U2 - 10.13025/19812

DO - 10.13025/19812

M3 - Comment/debate

SN - 2183-7635

VL - 1

SP - 55

EP - 58

JO - Urban Planning

JF - Urban Planning

IS - 1

ER -

Planning in/for/with the public

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this